Llama 4 Scout vs Maverick - Image Understanding Comparison

Compare image understanding capabilities of LLaMA 4 Scout and Maverick using a visual workflow that analyzes home decor scene descriptions.


If you're looking for an API, here is a sample code in NodeJS to help you out.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 const axios = require('axios'); const api_key = "YOUR API KEY"; const url = "https://api.segmind.com/workflows/68137e1d6f6ddb5db5716fd4-v2"; const data = { image: "publicly accessible image link", Your_Question: "the user input string" }; axios.post(url, data, { headers: { 'x-api-key': api_key, 'Content-Type': 'application/json' } }).then((response) => { console.log(response.data); });
Response
application/json
1 2 3 4 5 { "poll_url": "<base_url>/requests/<some_request_id>", "request_id": "some_request_id", "status": "QUEUED" }

You can poll the above link to get the status and output of your request.

Response
application/json
1 2 3 4 { "Llama_4_scout": "any user input string", "Llama_4_Maverick": "any user input string" }

Attributes


imageimage*

Your_Questionstr*

To keep track of your credit usage, you can inspect the response headers of each API call. The x-remaining-credits property will indicate the number of remaining credits in your account. Ensure you monitor this value to avoid any disruptions in your API usage.

Comparing Image Understanding in LLaMA 4 Models

This workflow is designed to benchmark and compare the visual reasoning and image understanding capabilities of two different versions of LLaMA 4-based models: LLaMA 4 Scout and LLaMA 4 Maverick. It's particularly useful for evaluating how well these models can describe visual content-specifically in the context of home furnishing and interior decor.

How It Works

At the core of the workflow is a shared image input-a high-resolution photo of a modern living room featuring colorful wall art, a sofa, coffee table, decorative pillows, and other decor elements. This image is routed to two parallel nodes, each powered by a different LLaMA 4 variant (Scout and Maverick). Both nodes are prompted with the same instruction:
"Describe all the home furnishing and home decor items in this image."

Each model independently generates a textual output, which is then displayed for side-by-side comparison. This allows you to analyze differences in:

  • Object recognition accuracy (e.g. does the model see the artwork, plant, or rug?)

  • Level of detail (e.g. does it mention materials, positions, and textures?)

  • Descriptive richness (e.g. does it infer style or aesthetic choices?)

  • Hallucinations or omissions in the generated output

This is especially useful for teams building vision-language models or deploying multimodal applications where accurate scene interpretation is critical-such as in eCommerce, design tools, or real estate platforms.

How to Customize

You can easily adapt this workflow to your own use cases by:

  • Changing the input image to any other domain (e.g. fashion, food, outdoor scenes, product photography)

  • Editing the prompt to tailor the kind of information you want extracted (e.g. "Identify potential hazards in this image" or "Write a product description for this photo")

  • Swapping models by replacing the LLaMA 4 nodes with other multimodal models like GPT-4V, Gemini Pro, Claude 3, etc.

  • Adding evaluation logic to score or rank model responses based on criteria like completeness or alignment with ground truth labels

This modular setup makes it ideal for running rapid A/B tests across vision-language models.

Cookie settings

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking "Accept all", you consent to our use of cookies.